Bet. 2001 and 2003 congress was trying to regulate martial Arts in America I need some opinions other than my own because i think this would be impossible unless they hired a martial Arts Master from every MA system from Karate to Kung fu to Ninjtsu etc.. am I insane or am I right to think this is wrong or even absurd?|||I believe what they were considering was legislation that would require a minimum level of certification with regard to individual martial artists who wanted to establish themselves as instructors and open schools. I don't think they were contemplating legislating who could obtain rank or grade etc.
I believe the intent was to treat the martial arts industry much like any other such educational, instructional, or health industry in the community right now, many of which require local licensure in order to operate legally. The intent was to reduce the number of charlatins, and increase the quality and safety of all classes.
While the idea and concept was a valid one, I believe the martial arts industry itself moved in some ways to quell the fears of congress and the issue became much less important in light of other national issues in the US. The last ten years have also seen a number of professional marital arts business associations and organizations develop to assist instructors, as well as a few university degree programs in martial arts. Things are heading in the right direction.
I do agree with the idea congress had, in that many people believe that earning a black belt immediately makes them a qualified instructor. Nothing could be further from the truth. I personally don't allow any instructor to teach within my association until they have been properly trained and certified through our own internal Instructor Training & Certifiction program. Indeed, most courts do not recognize a black belt certification as proof if instructor qualification, as few rank certificates say anything about the holder being an instructor - they normally only mention the successful completion of a course of study to earn a rank.
Having said all of that
I think government regulation should be the last straw when all else has failed. Our industry should police and regulate itself and should establish good, solid, and ethical business practices in all areas of our operations. If we do this for the majority of schools, then I'm sure the government will largely stay out of the way.
Ken C
9th Dan HapMoosaKi-Do
8th Dan TaeKwon-Do
7th Dan YongChul-Do|||I'm with you there's no way diplomats could ever understand what fighters go through.|||They had the "cart before the horse".
As we have seen in history many times……….First take away the firearms,then swords,bows and arrows,etc.
(Weapons)
And "Then" when people have no way to defend themselves except Martial Arts…………"Then" you first regulate then do away with Martial Arts.
(except for police & military)
Same old song and dance,if you study history you will find this "movie" has been played over and over all over the world.|||It would difficult .How would the legislators decide what was good or legitimate instruction.
For instance say they got this TKD or SHOTOKAN or KUNG FU etc. master to set down guide lines for teaching that method.
Master or not what he is going to promote is HIS idea of what constitutes good teaching which may be and probably is different from others in his own system.In trying to appease all factions you please no one.
You would end up with lowest common denominator teaching which is the kind of teaching you get in any mcdojo.